Another year of anti-PUL and Loyal Order denomination.

Again this summer was a miserable summer, weather wise it was an improvement on previous years, however on the parading, anti-Protestant, anti-Unionist, anti-Loyalist and anti-Loyal Order front it’s been another hot and irrational summer.

A case of bad timing and geography, and a shinner with a video camera showed a band playing outside a closed and empty building. The video by the Sinn Fein/provo activist, was then leapt upon by his leaders in the republican movement, a roman catholic bishop, his priest, his congregation, the newly formed concerned residents of Carrickhill, the SDLP, the ludicrous parades commission, and the ever dependable anti-Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist BBC, other print media and uncle Tom Cobley and all.

Thanks to all the above they kept this non-story running for months and raised community tensions to fever pitch.

What caused all this alleged angst, started the sky to fall in and the world coming to a premature end, a band playing outside an empty chapel. All this because one band played the Beach Boys tune Sloop John B, the alleged famine tune (it was not the famine song as they did not sing the words) outside an empty and closed chapel and empty and closed parochial house, an allegation that has yet to be proven. However what is proved is that the band did offer an apology for any misunderstanding and offence. 

The priest of the chapel was out of the country at the time and was phoned by a member of the Carrickhill residents group to be told that a band had played outside his chapel.

Before the BBC ensured the allegation was proved by contacting the band to get their view of events and a statement. They went live and reported the events on radio and then on TV later. The pompous Wendy Austin conducted her very own kangaroo court, and found not only the band guilty, but the whole Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist community along with every Loyal Order member.

The BBC thought their guilty judgment was given a hint legitimisation when senior Protestant church leaders wedded in. But after they were given the facts, their ill-informed views were revised and retracted.

To put this into context it’s not as if the band abused an altar boy or girl, but to listen to the media and republicans you would have thought that is what went on. Sexual and physical abuse within the roman catholic church on their own people, is a ten page article for another day, but in the perverted minds of  BBC NI and other media outlets, an unsubstantiated trumped up case of alleged sectarianism is manna from heaven.

This is what the republican movement, a bishop, his absent priest, his congregation the SDLP and the irrational parades commission are allegedly getting so offended about. A band playing outside an empty building and showing off their marching skills as they did so.

They are allegedly offended by a Scottish football song, telling a section of the Scottish population, who don’t see themselves as Scottish but Irish to go home to Ireland?

Here are the facts that the list above don’t want or like to digest; the potato famine wasn’t an exclusively Irish roman catholic, Irish nationalist or Irish republican event.

Many tens of thousands of Protestants both in Ireland and Scotland were affected and died as a result of the famine. However the Irish roman catholic church, Irish nationalists and Irish republicans, have made an exclusive apartheid industry out of the famine, and this event is more evidence if ever we needed it, of their ‘Most Offended People Ever’ (MOPE) title.

Protestant and Unionist famine victims also died in the streets and were forced to emigrate to escape the famine. The cemeteries on the Shankill Road and at Clifton Street where famine cemeteries as were other cemeteries around Belfast, and nearly every Protestant parish in Ireland and the west of Scotland had thousands of Protestants buried in mass graves.

At this point I would like to point out that the Irish roman catholic church, along with Irish nationalists and Irish republicans have cultivated and created an exclusive and apartheid history of the famine and created a whole industry around the famine. Never mentioning in their story and their revisionist view the fact that the famine had thousands Protestant victims and suffers???

http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3311/1/2011StephenMLitt.pdf

Knowing now that the famine song is about people who don't see themselves as Scottish and that there were thousands of Protestants famine victims; then surely that makes any alleged offence taken from any alleged famine tune by Irish roman catholic’s and Irish republicans and nationalists somewhat mute???

What is not in doubt and overtly sectarian is the fact that the potato famine was used by Irish republican terrorists as a recruiting sergeant to swell the ranks of Irish republican terrorist groups.

To this day the leader of the Irish republican movement Gerry Adams is still going around the world giving a prejudiced and apartheid view of the facts of the famine. He is also trying to redefine the terms used to describe the famine, as the Irish Holocaust. Now that is offensive.

There is a famine visitor village at Doagh, County Donegal. And if you visit it you will not see any mention of the Protestant victims of the famine.

Interestingly the republicans and roman catholic sensitivities and offence on the famine does not stretch to the closed season at the famine village. During the closed season the famine village is turned into “Donegal Lapland” a commercial jolly, dance in the streets Christmas visitor attraction.

Now because of this alleged offence and the BBC’s live kangaroo court, we have had more Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist and Loyal Order vilification by the ever pious Sinn Fein/IRA republican movement, the SDLP, the Irish roman catholic church, the parades commission, local print media and middle class Protestant Unionists. And now we have another contrived contentious parade area. An area that throughout the troubles was never contentious???

You are probably wondering what has parading issues, got to do with the Protestant Unionist middle classes??? Well everything. The parades issue cannot be seen in isolation; it has to be seen as a wider campaign of a republican war on two fronts. Both wars are being waged on the Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist communities working and middle class a war on parades and education.

As a result of republican attempts to demonize the working class Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist and the Loyal Orders both nationally and internationally. The aim of republicans is to get it into the minds of middle class Protestants and Unionists, by the use of contrived contentious flash points and alleged offence. That the other part of the Protestant Unionist family is not worthy of support, people who see parades as an integral part of their culture.

Now let me spell this out the second front in the republican movement’s war, a war on education, in the guise of the 11+ and grammar schools.

The republican movement’s education ministers have removed the 11+, and have insured that it has stayed that way by taking the education portfolio at every Stormont assembly.

The republican movement see grammar education as pivotal in breaking the Protestant and Unionist middle classes. The 11+ is being portrayed as the preserve of affluent middle class Protestants and Unionists. The 11+ is the middle class Protestant and Unionist parades commission issue.

The republican movement’s education minister has threatened parents with court and used the ever willing left leaning republican media and the BBC to demonize the 11+. He has ensured that primary schools do not have time allocated in their timetable to teach and prepare children for the new transfer tests and has also threatened primary school principals with sanctions if they go outside these procedures. This from a Sinn Fein education minister who cries at every opportunity about equality and choice, what choice will Protestants and Unionists have in his Ireland of equals?

The other part of the 11+ campaign is very subtle and you may have missed it. The republican movement’s education ministers have at every opportunity demonised working class Protestant, Unionist, and Loyalist education achievement. By claiming the 11+ is elitist and stating that it disadvantages working class Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist communities. This is putting working class and middle class Protestant, Unionist and Loyalist communities in direct conflict with each other.

This is similar to the republican movement attempts at contriving or making parts of if not all of a parade continuous. They then charge in with the old chestnut of cost to the economy for the policing. This after decades of republican violence and rioting at now contrived continuous parades. The shinners/provos don’t do irony do they?

The republican movement is driving a wedge between Protestant, Unionist and Loyalist communities. The middle class Protestants and Unionists see the parades as something that does not involve them. And the working class Protestants, Unionists and Loyalists, are being told that good education and the 11+ is elitist an anathema, and not for them.

The republican movement are splitting the Protestant, Unionist and Loyalist communities along class lines and they are driving a coach and horses through the Protestant, Unionist and Loyalist communities, which their terrorist campaign could ever do.

What do we do? We need like 100 years ago to come together in common cause.

My final word on this is that the Protestant and Unionist middle classes, they have more to lose than the working class. Unless Protestant and Unionist middle classes wake up and start smelling the coffee and support the Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist working classes their cause is lost. They need to get out and vote and the main Unionist Parties need to become one.

United We Stand Divided We Fall.

The shinners/provos are masters at street politics and that’s why they pick on issues that they know irritate the PUL community hence the flag issue and parades. The shinners then stand back and berate the PUL community for their reaction.

This is done to keep their electorates eye off the fact that they have not delivered on any of the issues that will lead to a united Ireland. If the shinners/provos are seen to annoy the PUL community this fulfils the sectarian lust within the republican movement and their electorate, and it’s dressed up as equality.

Republicans in my view always seem to be setting the agenda, and Unionists look stupid as they are left scrambling or floundering around trying to play catch up.

With Unionists in constant reactionary mode it makes us looks weak and ineffective. Unionist politicians need to wake up and realise they are in a political war. They need to anticipate issues and think strategically and long term and put the focus on shinner ministers and their non-delivery.

Here is an example of the republican’s strategic and long term vision.

Over 25 years ago the shinners started a new phase of their anti-Protestant, Unionist; Loyalist campaign when they created alleged residents groups.

In 1997, Gerry Adams told an RTÉ journalist of the shinners/provos involvement in the now parades disputes: "Ask any activist in the north, ‘did Drumcree happen by accident?’, and he will tell you, ‘no’. Three years of work on the lower Ormeau Road, Portadown and parts of Fermanagh and Newry, Armagh and in Bellaghy and up in Derry. Three years of work went into creating that situation and fair play to those people who put the work in. They are the type of scene changes that we have to focus on and develop and exploit"!

This was the start of a campaign of vilification and demonization of the Loyal Orders ably assisted by the mass media, especially the BBC.

The Loyal Orders and Unionists did not handle the situation well and I’m sure that was anticipated by the shinners and they exploited this to the full, and still do. This was the first salvo and the start of a shinner/provo twin track campaign to divide Unionism.

The next phase was more subtle. When the shinners/provos moved into the first assembly Martin McGuinness and Sinn Fein took the education portfolio. They now moved onto the Protestant Unionist middle classes, with the second salvo in their campaign the removing of the 11+.

We need to remember that the shinners/provos have taken the education portfolio first, before all other ministries in the assembly. Our children have only ever had a shinner/provo education minister, there have been three in total in the Stormont assemblies.

The shinners/provo continuing campaign of Loyal Order and working class Unionist Loyalist demonization and vilification is designed to alienate and divide the middle class Protestant Unionist, from the working class Protestant Unionist and Loyalist.

The shinners/provos have ensured that the Loyal Orders and the working class Unionist and Loyalists are seen as irrelevant and something that must be avoided by the Protestant Unionist middle classes.

To ensure that the working class Protestant Unionists Loyalist are alienated from the middle class Protestant Unionist the shinners/provos claim that the grammar school education system is middle class and elitist. Claiming that working class Protestant Unionist Loyalist social mobility is not attainable via the middle class and elitist grammar school system. And to achieve their divide and rule, they demonize working class Protestant Unionist Loyalist education attainment.

To summarise, with republican fanaticism and zeal the shinners/provos vilify and demonize the Loyal Orders to ensure the Protestant Unionist middle class see it as irrelevant and something to be avoided. Then they demonize working class Protestant Unionist Loyalist educational attainment, and social mobility with the result that they have basically set both sides of Unionism on a course of mutual loathing. Clever stuff!!!

So over a period of 20 odd years the shinners have created a chasm between the two sections of Unionism. Resulting in low Unionist voter turnout, and republican wins by default.

What every Unionist and Loyalist needs to remember, is that the shinners see themselves as a mass movement, and have a long term strategic plan.

The Unionist people and their parties now need to step up to the plate and prove that they have the same political acumen as the republican movement in the guise of Sinn Fein/IRA and get out an vote.

The future is in our hands make your X's and 123's where it counts on a ballot paper not just now but always. As the shinners/provos say "vote early vote often". Just in case the psni are reading this that last sentence was a joke. And just for the psni officers that don't know the difference in the term sentence. A sentence is not just something that a flag protester gets on trumped up charges from the psni, a sentence is: A set of words that is complete in itself, typically containing a subject and predicate, conveying a statement, question, exclamation!!! or A grammatical unit that is syntactically independent and has a subject that is expressed or, as in imperative sentences, understood and a predicate that contains at least one finite verb.

Sinn Fein/IRA parades

I have listened to the shinners/provos try to explain and defend their position and rational on their latest terrorist glorification parade in Castlederg. 

The first and most glaringly obvious point is that this parade was organized and supported by Sinn Fein/IRA, and these two provos who blew themselves up, did so in the Irish republic not Castlederg. But that fact has been over looked in their desire to shock and offend and get a reaction out of the Protestant Unionist Loyalist community.

The shocking part of this parade is that the intended location for the shinner/provo bomb was Castlederg. They only reasonable conclusion that anyone can draw from this Castlederg parade, is that they are going out of their way to be offensive by celebrating and glorifying the fact that these two provos were going to kill and maim men, woman and children in Castlederg, incredible. 

More importantly the shinners/provos ignored and snubbed the real victims of their terror in Castlederg, a charge that they have often laid at the door of the Army and the PUL community. 

With the selection of Castlederg the shinners/provos have now moved their terrorist glorification into a new sphere of obnoxiousness. The selection of Castlederg was so crassly offensive it is indefensible no matter how much spin the shinners/provos try to put on it.

One of their more sickening attempts to justify this parade is to equate their terrorist dead to that of the men and women who died in World Wars and other conflicts this is to all decent people disingenuous. However it gives us a great insight into the republican mind set. And when you add this to their claim that the greater percentage of the area is republican/nationalist they sound more and more like the fascists the Protestant Unionist Loyalist community always knew they were.     

After the shinners/provos started defended their decision to parade in Castlederg, they started to thrash around looking for scape goats. So in the next breath they attempted to rubbish the Orange Order and the UVF for requesting and doing exactly the same as what they are doing, I have to say the shinners/provos don’t do irony.

This leaves the shinners/provos juxtaposition rather interesting.

The shinners/provos want nay demand to have a terrorist glorification parade in a shared space yet they are denying the Orange Order the same request, of use of a shared space. The Orange Orders wish to make their way home using the shared space of the Crumlin road??? The shinners/provos demanded that the Orange Order talk to residents and ask permission to use this shared road, yet they did not engage with the other users and victims of Castlederg about using this shared space.

Next they claimed that the UVF are orchestrating protests, and as yet no member of the UVF has been arrested by the psni over taking part in never mind orchestrating any protest. However that can’t be said of the shinner/provo conspired protests, in fact the reality is even a little more stranger. It was the shinners/provos who were the first group to protest at parades, and continues to protest with their shinner/provo backed residents groups.

The hypocrisy from the shinners/provos is astonishing, and this is not even taking into account the fact that their chairman Declan Kearney was on the radio this morning still talking about a shared this and that, incredible. 

The shinners/provos have now lost any claim no matter how tenuous to the media moral high ground, over the UVF and Orange Order with this parade in Castlederg. They are now doing the very thing they are claiming others of doing. 

In every interview they have been claiming that the area of Castlederg has a republican/nationalist majority, thus trying to make the claim that every republican/nationalist who lives there has the same views as them on this parade. Again this is a fascist trait. 

They are now turning into a parody of the old Unionist parties they wanted to get rid of. If the shinners/provos did hypocrisy then it would be the best hypocrisy in the world. 

With the selection of Castlederg for this parade the shinners/provos have now moved terrorist parading issue into a new and offensive sphere and have left themselves in a strangely politically isolated place and all the while they talk of peace.

I can now see a vision of the future, where we have commemoration parades to the Shankill butchers and the Dublin and Monaghan bombings making their way around the shared spaces of Northern Ireland. This is the natural out workings to the shinner/provo parade today.

For those in the Irish republic they need sit up and take notice, because if the shinners/provos take more seats in the republic and get a hint of power and ministries in the republic, they can expect similar politicking in the south.

 I despair for the people of the south they don’t know what they are letting themselves in for.  

The shinners/provos are fascists and the sooner the electorate in the
south waken to those the fact they are going to have the same madness in the south as we are having here in Northern Ireland the better. 

At this point I would like to quote the bible, “sow the wind and reap the
whirlwind”!!! 

A few chickens are now starting to come home to roost in the south and it’s all because various Irish governments’ acquiesced and pandered to the shinners/provos in an asinine attempt to stick one to the British and keep the shinners/provos at bay.    

In reality all this contrived republican/nationalist parading offence, is all window dressing the parading issue is a deflection from the real issue. That issue is this; since the shinners/provos went into a power sharing government with Unionists they have not moved their united Ireland aspiration one iota. 

In fact in recent opinion polls they are losing ground, and 25% of their own voters don’t want a united Ireland. How do they think they are going to convince Unionists if they are removing flags and contriving parading issues, they haven’t even convinced 100% of their own electorate of the merits of the united Ireland? 

What needs to happen is that both governments need to face down the shinners/provos. But we all know won’t as they don’t have the required back bone and so we better get used to summers like the one we have just had. 

As for the psni, parades commission and the bbc they are no innocent bystanders in is sordid little war. With reckless poling, irrational parades determinations and bias and reckless public broadcasting, we now have the perfect storm of sectarian politics, parades chaos, police ineptitude and public broadcaster propaganda, feeding into a situation that is getting more and more unstable every day. 


If the shinners/provos were to be honest but we know they can't, therefore it's up to me to tell you the truth that dare not speak its name not only in west Belfast but in all republican areas. 

The shinners/provos only speak for and represent themselves; the only thriving industry in west Belfast is the shinner/provo merry-go-round of their old bhoy community workers, shinner/provo ex-prisoner nepotism and the playing to the gallery of their sycophant electoral groupies on parading issues. 

Thus deflecting away from the real day to day matters that affect their electorate. 

The shinners have long cultivated and created a disaffected republican underclass. A disaffected underclass even they are now seemingly embarrassed about. 
An underclass that a few short years ago would have been the street soldiers that the shinners relied upon to keep Belfast and other republican areas unstable and un-policeable. 

Currently this underclass doesn’t fit in with the current shinner/provo agenda. The disaffected underclass is joining the so called dissident groupings who won’t obey the shinner/provo politicos. 

We will just have to wait and see how this pans out in republican areas, as no doubt sometime in the not too distant future when it's politically expedient, the shinners will be using these republican underclass rioters again. 

The reason the shinners don't speak for the teenagers who attend republican bonfires or those in their twenties who need and want jobs and futures. Is because she shinners have achieved nothing for them and continue to achieve nothing. 

Yet they continue to be only voice in west Belfast and have been so for over 30 years??? The shinners and republicans' can't lay that one at the door of the Protestants Unionist Loyalist community, any underclass and under achievement in republican areas is down to the shinners and the shinners alone they cultivated it and nourished it. 

Industry in west Belfast is going InBev gone and Visteon gone, investment conferences that hold their noses as they swish's past West Belfast ferrying ministers and Investors to other parts of Belfast, Hillsborough and Cultra. 

Adams, Maskey and the shinners might have got away with pointing to the lack of investment in this constituency in 1983 and saying: "Nothing to do with me, mate." 30 years on and you'd buy a house in Ross Street quicker than you'd buy that.

All the shinners are interested in is sticking one to the PUL community. They play politics with every issue and this plays well to their blinkered sycophant electoral cannon fodder, as they trot out the some old platitudes about the bad old PUL community.

Here is a cold hard fact; the shinners have created a culture of disaffection and now as proved with the republican bonfires. It's something they can't or maybe don't want to turn off.  They will probably perceive they can get some political advantage out of it. 

No doubt there will be a succession of shinners on condemning the actions of the rioters and praising the psni. The psni are still seen as the enemy, not only by the DHLA (and the IBA) who scribbled the anti psni graffiti on the wall but by the wider republican community not only in west Belfast but across Northern Ireland. 

Yet what do we get, the shinners coming out and praising the psni, criticizing those whom they say they represent and who they created and all this to stick one to the PUL community and their 11th night bonfires and parades. 

If the shinners/provos would do more for their own electorate, the electorate they ad nauseum say they represent they would be better off. If they would start improving their life chances in education, jobs and health they would be far better off. Rather than trying to score cheap sectarian political points at the PUL communities' expense. 

A well-educated, well paid and healthy republican population is a shinner/provo oxymoron. Would a well-educated, well paid and healthy republican population vote for the Marxist in the shinners??? No I didn't think so ether. 

No it's the former that gets the shinners their votes and keeps them in the style they have now become all too well accustomed to. The latter is just too much of your average shinner to comprehend.

It's better for the shinners to keep the people in ghettos than have a prosperous west Belfast and to keep this situation going they need to deflect from their ineptitude and keep sectarian politics at the fore. Keeping the focus of their sycophant electorate on parades, unionists and the orange order is the alpha and omega for the shinners.

psni child informers

I would like to make my community aware of an official psni policing policy below.

It is an official operational policing policy endorsed by Judith Gillespie of the psni and no doubt by the pompous republican biased Will Kerr and the equally pompous republican biased Matt Baggott.

"In September 2006 it was confirmed that Assistant Chief Constable Judith Gillespie approved the PSNI policy of using children as informants including in exceptional circumstances to inform on their own family but not their parents. The document added safeguards included having a parent or "appropriate adult" present at meetings between juveniles and their handler. It also stressed a child's welfare should be paramount when considering the controversial tactics and required that any risk had been properly explained to them and a risk assessment completed".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_Service_of_Northern_Ireland

I would like to know if the psni let the community groupings they are meeting, in Matt Baggotts community policing boards, that they are grooming or operating child informers in their area?

I find it interesting that Will Kerr has been giving a lot of his media time to the fact that children are involved in street disturbances. However I find it equally interesting to note that he has no problem in grooming and using children as street informers.

Maybe he can tell us what is the difference in him and the psni grooming and using children, and the children getting themselves involved in disturbances. I see it as the most obvious case of hypocrisy you will ever see.

And maybe the psni can tell us who or what is an "appropriate adult" when questioning child informers??? Is the use of children as informers a way of using the children to leaver influence on the child's parents or guardian to become informers???

I put it to will Kerr that the throwing stones is wrong, however the psni grooming and using children as informers is abhorrent.

The grooming and use of child informers by the psni are the type of activities that Human Rights groups, NGO's and democratic governments would criticize despot regimes off. The psni grooming running child informers is reminiscent of the Stasi in communist east Germany and despot fundamentalist regimes of Africa and the middle and far east. Not a so called democratic society.

The psni have no problems or issues with grooming and using our children as informers. But have they really considered the coast to the children their parents or relatives and community relations if the children are found to be informers.

They are obviously not concerned for the children's welfare by putting them in the front line of intelligence gathering.

The reason for this post is that I have been made aware of the increasing reports of the rising numbers of our children being stopped by the psni.
If any of our children or young people are being groomed as informers by the psni this is a very serious matter and needs to be taken to the highest levels of national government.

The next question I have are the psni stopping these children lawfully. Or are they putting undue pressure, "grooming" the children they stop in an attempt to recruit more of our children into their informer and intelligence gathering rings???

It surely can't be coincidental that the psni are stopping more and more of our children, the psni officers on the ground are not doing these things in isolation, they have obviously been ordered by the psni hierarchy to go out and intimidate our children by stopping and interrogating them and then groom them for their informer rings. We need to know if out children and young people are being pressured, groomed and recruited as psni informers???

Not that when questioned by our community that we would get an honest or straight answer from the psni. The psni are more into spin and the dark arts of demonizing our community, grooming and running child informers than dispensing policing evenhandedly.

Our politicians need to ask some serious questions of Baggott, Kerr and Gillespie and tell them they need to stop intimidating and grooming the children of our community. If they have evidence of wrong doing then arrest them, but the psni need to stop the blunt policy of stopping children and young people as it is wrecking what little community relations there are left. And added to this the possibility of the psni grooming and recruiting children as informers with their increasing non accountable psni stops.

If as we are being told by the establishment, that we are becoming a normal society, why is there a need for child to used by the psni as an informer???

It must surely be a breach of the child's Human Rights to be used as a psni informer, hardly community or human rights based policing that Baggott, Kerr and Gillespie keep telling us.

Unionist and Loyal Order Leadership

First and foremost Unionist politicos and Belfast County Grand Lodge need to give better leadership. Unionist politicos are under the delusion that the shinners/provos war is over, they are such naive fools. As for the BCGL they are stuck in the 19th century when we need them to be looking to the future, a future that if they were up to it, could be bright, beautiful and Orange.

There is no point in going over the ashes as to why the shinners/provos called a secession to their terror. We all know they were losing the conflict. More and more of their expert personnel were getting older with less of a belly for the fight, added to the fact that they were infiltrated from the lowest provo to the most senior shinner by Special Branch and MI5. So the only sensible option was to grasp the SDLP olive branch that gives them a face saving way out of their terror.

After moving into this new phase it should not be forgotten that just like the DUP the shinners/provos were not fully committed to the peace arrangements. They still had to see how the republican masses would react. In the end they bought into the process but with an agenda of not working the agreements but to undermine the system from within, and the bonus was that they could do this and get paid by the British to administer British rule, very badly I may add. I think we can all say without fear of contradiction that the shinners/provos are doing a first class shoddy job at administrating British rule in Northern Ireland. The strategy that they are using is to divide and rule.

I must stress again that we should be under no illusion the shinners/provos are waging a war, and it’s a good war, it’s a war on several fronts. It’s war on the streets, it’s a war at Stormont, it’s a class war and it’s a propaganda war.

One of the main aims of this war is to further divide the PUL community along class lines by using parading and schooling. And I have to say they are doing a first class job of it, by using all the complex fronts above as a single strategy.

Unionist politicos are giving the impression that now that we have the Stormont assembly, the Good Friday agreement and the St Andrews agreement, and several polls that say a sizeable majority wish to stay within the UK, we are safe. These polls maybe factually correct, however the facts being played out on the ground and on our TV’s and radios day in and day out is very different.

The reality is that nothing has changed the republican/nationalist sectarian war is on-going and intensifying. On the 12^th night Gerry Kelly in a TV interview claimed that a stretch of the Crumlin road is now exclusively romanist and therefore de facto republican, in essence a no go area for the Protestant Unionist Loyalist community.

This claim rather than being rebutted is being given a hint of legitimacy by the parades commission determinations and how the psni police the area or not as the case maybe, along with its shinner/provo politicos.

Here is where the war is being won and lost, republicans have taken on board the situation on the street and in the polls and have now moved their politics and strategy to their phase to use the weapons of parades and class to further alienate working class and middle class Unionists. They are back onto the streets but not in the mass civil disturbances of the 60’s and 70’s, but in a subtle and cunning way and drawing in reactionary Unionist Orange thinking, and they are using the psni, parades commission and residents groups as the spearhead in their war against the PUL community, all very clever stuff.

Unionists and the Orange Order need to wake up and start smelling the rotting smell of decay that is coming from the psni, the parades commission and the shinners/provos. They all need to be seen as the enemies’ weapons and we must take nothing they say as genuine or binding. 

We need to start using the system to defeat the system, why did BCGL not take this irrational decision on the 12^th to the courts??? At every turn republicans use the system and the courts!!! Why can’t we???

Is it, it would cost too much??? Well what cost the Union!!! Why can’t they have a list of people who are eligible for legal aid and get them to take the issues to the courts, republicans do it all over Northern Ireland, why can’t we???

The shinners/provos have got the psni and the parades commission eating out of their hands. But more importantly they have the media gorging at the table of propaganda. With Ardoyne and Donegall Street and every other contrived flash point they have the media headline grabbers there waiting for the least indiscretion so it’s the next day’s headline. And with every flash point and bad headline we lose more and more support especially middle class support.

Not that the middle classes don’t have their problems to with the shinners/provos, in the scraping of the 11+ and the inevitable scrapping of grammar schools.

Each issue in their PUL class war is being portrayed by the shinners/provos as mutually exclusive. We won’t help the middle classes because the shinners/provos have turned us against them, and they are turning their backs on us because of the parade disturbances and the lack of support the working class give to the grammar school system.

We don’t support the Unionist middle classes and they won’t support us, very cleaver stuff.

The shinners/provos have made us into pariahs for the Unionist middle classes, with contrived continuous parades, bonfires, the blue bag brigade and irrational parades commission determinations and media performances. And when you throw into the mix the shinners/provos demonization of working class poor education attainment you have the perfect storm. 

Every education minister in the assembly has been a shinner/provo. First there was Martin McGuinness, then Caitriona Ruane now John O’Dowd. During this time they have been emphasising the poor education attainment of our children especially the children from working class PUL communities in inner cities. 

This is their main wepon to ensure that the middle classes will never back the working classes, as they will not want to be dragged into a comprehensive education system.

As for the working classes they have been told by the shinners that the grammar school system is elitist and if you fail the 11+ you are now irrelevant and a failure.

After 15 years of shinner/provo education ministers, it is an indictment on their miss handling of the portfolio that we still have these poor education attainment figures in working class schools. Why are there no hard questions being asked of the shinners/provos and their track record. 15 years is a whole school generation and we are no better off today than we were before they took the job. 

 

But I suspect that was all part of their strategy. 

Unless all sections of the PUL community come together we are a lost cause, and until the Unionist politicos especially Peter Robinson, wakes up and starts smelling the feces that we are wadding in, we will be drowning in it and I fear that day is not that far off.

A classic example of this can be found on the Saturday after the 12^th, Martin McGuinness was in Ardoyne to listen to the republicans.

Where was the leader of Unionism Peter Robinson??? Is he so aloof being first minister that he does not feel the need to meet the working class PUL community on the ground and in their heart lands? Is he saying we are not important enough for the first minister to visit? Does Robinson know where the Shankill, Twaddell Avenue, Woodvale, Crumlin or Ballysillan is? I suppose if he is never seen on the ground in his own constituency of East Belfast and where he lives. There is little or no chance he is ever going to make his way to North Belfast to meet the people he says he leads???

Peter Robinson is not the leader that Unionism needs, and the DUP shenanigans at Stormont are an embarrassment, as for the Orange Order, it’s heading for irrelevance. And I say that with a heavy heart as a former member who left it in exasperation; however I still have the best interests of the Order at heart.

Let me relate a story told to me recently by a colleague. Paisley, had talks with the Tories prior to the signing of the St Andrews agreement. Paisley was aware that Cameron was most likely to win at the next election. However if there was a tight election result the Tories wanted to know if they could rely on DUP help if they needed their votes if there was a small Tory majority.

Paisley aware of Cameron’s willingness to bring in radical policies, asked if they form a government at Stormont would they be able to block homosexual marriage and abortion. Cameron gave those assurances. Weeks later we had a Stormont assembly.

Paisley and the DUP put their own narrow theological religious interests before the greater good of the PUL community. We now have a Stormont assembly working to a shinner and DUP political and theological agendas, not an assembly working for or in the best interests of the majority, but for and to the narrow agenda of the two main parties.

The DUP would rather destroy any Unionist opposition than respect their alternative views and form alliances to defeat the real enemy. However we need only look at their arrogance over the Red Sky debacle and on the Maze issue, to see there destructive mind set.

As for the Orange Order I have contacted them with my concerns and ideas over the years, and they are totally ignored. If they were doing a good job you could understand them ignoring my communications. But the reality is they seem to be rudderless and floundering around with the shinners/provos pulling the strings.

You would think that they would be open to ideas from the PUL community that could assist in getting parades and Organism marching. With a better press, and getting the institution opened to a wider section of the PUL community. 

However they seem to be still living in the 19th century let alone the 21st century. They like the Unionist parties are reactionary and not proactive. We are not media savvy, this lets the republican hoards run rings around them, and with their allies in the media we look prehistoric and obstinate.

The Loyal Orders are by far their own worst enemy, they need to review their future strategy and reflect on where they want to be, not in the next few weeks but in decades ahead. And that goes for the DUP, UUP and the other Unionist parties, but that takes strategic thinking and to be honest I don’t see any. As for the Crumlin road I don’t see them getting back up the road unless they have meaning full talks with republicans. We need to be more confident of our position and go into talks, after all if we talk they can’t put any more restrictions on other than totally ban the parade and the republicans have said in media interviews that they don’t want to stop the parade just respect. Well we should take them up on that challenge and what would we lose? But that needs leadership and do we have a walking, talking, thinking, leader?

After the parades commission gave the determination for the Crumlin road, no return parade. Did they work on the premise that if there is no home parade no one would want to use the Crumlin road to access the greater Ardoyne or Ballysillan???

Gerry Kelly described the area as a 100% catholic in a TV interview on the 12^th night, he also said (I Para phrase) “that they will not be walking up this road”.

All fine and dandy Gerry, the implication being that men, women and children from the PUL who live locally can’t use this road, and they need Gerry’s or the shinners permission to use or make their way home along the Crumlin road???

If there is no parade the Orange Order and the Unionist need to get the psni to give assurances that those who wish to use or go to their homes in the greater Ardoyne and Ballysillan areas along the Crumlin road, who are on foot will be facilitated. If they refuse take them to court.

The parades commission and psni can’t demand that they all return home by 8pm, as they are private individuals going about their lawful business.

As for Kelly, I would suggest that Gerry Kelly’s rhetoric needs to be challenged as he stated that, that part of the Crumlin road is now the de facto, “independent Irish catholic republic of Ardoyne”.

All this has come as news to me as I use this area on an almost daily basis. Is this the shared space and future Kelly and the shinners keep telling me about??? I get the impression that when there is a catholic or nationalist/republican majority the shinners and local populous turn into a mirror image of the things they are charging Unionists and the Orange Order off. Strange how things go around.

Do I now need to ask Gerry’s or the shinners permission to access the area???

I find what Kelly said offensive as I’m sure will those from the PUL community who live and work around this area, and those who want to go home via the Crumlin road on the 12th night or any other time of the year for that matter.

Maybe I should put in a Gerry or shinner 11/1916 to get a determination to see if I can use the Crumlin road???

For Gerry in his, independent Irish catholic republic of Ardoyne. Here is an insight into my use of the now, independent Irish catholic republic of Ardoyne, I go to the car wash, I go to the Credit Union, I go to the library, I go to the chemist and shops, and go up and down the Ardoyne and Crumlin road on an almost daily basis.

Memo to self must Gerry’s say so if I want to use the car wash, credit union, library, chemist and shops. Must now carry passport to check in at border control when wishing to enter the, independent Irish catholic republic of Ardoyne, on my way to and from home. As this new statelet is not part of the EU yet and as such there is no open border policy yet.

Lastly and more importantly, Kelly is playing to another gallery; he has an electorate to win back and to play up to. GARC have been giving the shinners a hard time in the “independent Irish catholic republic of Ardoyne” and Kelly and the shinners need to win back some credibility.

At every flash point Unionist politicos both MLA’s and MP’s should be there videoing the goings on of republicans and the psni. There should be a dedicated Orange Order or Unionist facebook and youtube page, just like the shinners have. And I should be specifically dedicated to propaganda, where eyewitness can give their testimony to counter republican propaganda. As for the Orange Order if they call people to protest they need to be there on the front line, not at the Park Avenue hotel wining and dining.

RANGER 1640

Parades

Now that the BBC, Belfast Telegraph, the Irish News, Sinn Fein, the (shinners lite) SDLP, the irrational and discredited parades commission, the Roman Catholic church, the PSNI and Uncle Tom Cobley, have all vented their spleen at the Loyal Orders and the Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist community over an alleged sectarian incident out side an closed empty building.

We now have the absurd situation of Sinn Fein lecturing the Protestant, Unionist and Loyalist community about upholding the law and accepting parades commission's biased determinations. What a strange old world this is.

At this point I would urge everyone in the PUL community, to video and monitor every republican parade more closely. I would also urge the PUL community to scan the parades commission website for republican parades and if they pass or come close to a, Protestant church, Mission Hall, War Memorial, Cemetery, Orange Hall/Loyal Order Hall, school or close to a PUL area etc, we should put in an objection to the parades commission.

We should ensure that no republican band is glorifying terrorism with its name displays of weapons on bass drums and or banners. They must have the name of the band on both sides of the bass drum and no signs of weaponry, and they must not have uniforms that resemble paramilitary uniforms, and no covering of faces with scarves.

We must ensure that no republican parade has weapons, even if they are allegedly legally held replica weapons. We should demand that weapons are banned from the parade irrespective of their use in alleged republican street theatre. No republican banner must depict terrorists with or without weapons.

All the above is part of the parades commission code of conduct.

Now the main point of the post, we should ask the Roman Catholic church to clarify their position on the use of Roman Catholic church property for political demonstrations, terrorist commemorations and parades? 

With specific reference to the hunger strike parades and rallies, Easter rising parades, political rallies by Sinn Fein/IRA, the INLA and all the other republican terror and para political groupings.

As the Roman Catholic church has not halted any of these political demonstrations, terrorist commemorations and parades. We can only conclude that they must approve the use of their properties for these activities by these groupings? At no time do I ever recall the Roman Catholic Church coming out and stating that they were banning these groupings or activities from their property.

Lets remind ourselves of what these groupings and activities are like. There are people dressed in paramilitary uniforms, there are political speeches , there are republican bands named after terrorists playing sectarian music, there are banners and photographs depicting republican terrorists, there are people holding alleged decommissioned weapons and there are republican terrorist memorials all on or taking place at or on Roman Catholic church property.

Does the Roman Catholic primate of Ireland Sean Brady sanction this use personally or does he delegate this responsibility down to his bishops and do they section the use of their property for these events???

Do they also approve the use of their church buildings for republican bands to practice in? Republican bands that are named after republican terrorists???

Will they clarify their position on the use of Roman Catholic church property with the displays and activities mentioned above? Will they confirm if they regard these activities as non-sectarian and not glorifying terrorism? And do they consider these activities, fit and proper activities to take place on Roman Catholic church property and do they perceive these activities as nonsectarian and not anti Protestant Unionist and Loyalist???

We should also remember that Easter and Easter Sunday is the most important celebration in the Christian calendar. It is the time when the Lord Jesus died so we might be saved, it is a time of peace and forgiveness. Yet all over the island of Ireland the Roman Catholic church allows its property to be used for sectarian terrorist glorification and political rabble rousing.

All of which does not fit in with the Easter message or the church of Rome's alleged ethos of peace, forgiveness and sanctity of life!!!

  

If and when we get these answers we can then watch the BBC, the Belfast Telegraph, the Irish News, Sinn Fein, the (shinners lite) SDLP, the irrational parades commission, the Roman Catholic church, the PSNI and Uncle Tom Cobley. Dance on pinheads condoning the acts above.

We should also ensure the media are reminded of these activities at every opportunity.

We need these question asked of the Roman Catholic Church .

Would the much acclaimed alleged religion of peace the Roman Catholic Church, specifically the Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Down and Connor Noel Treanor. The same diocese which St Patrick's church in Donegall Street belongs to. The same church which was at the center of a claim of sectarian offence, which was allegedly perpetrated when, and there is no disputing this fact the chapel was closed and empty and no service was taking place and the priest was out of the country?
Do they condone the use of Milltown cemetery for the activities mentioned above.

Does Sean Brady the Roman Catholic primate of Ireland or Bishop of Down and Connor Noel Treanor or his trustees give his or their permission for the use of Miltown cemetery for terrorist veneration and glorification and sectarian political rallies?

With that permission we can only then assume that Sean Brady, Noel Treanor and the trustees of Milltown, approve and condone the use of Roman Catholic Church property for acts of sectarian paramilitary displays, terrorist glorification, terrorist memorials and political speeches?

Can they confirm if they think that Roman Catholic Church property the correct and a fitting place for memorials to IRA/INLA and other Irish republican terrorists? Memorials that glorify the murderous acts of sectarian Irish republican terrorists, who murdered not only Protestants but their fellow Roman Catholics???

Do Sean Brady and Connor Noel Treanor condone the use of Miltown cemetery as a fitting place for political parties namely Sinn Fein and other Irish republican para-political groupings that are aligned to Irish republican terrorist organizations to hold political rallies???

Do Sinn Fein feel this is an appropriate use of Roman Catholic Church property and do Sinn Fein consider their actions in Miltown cemetery and all other Roman Catholic Church property that is similarly used for the glorification of sectarian Irish republican terrorist killers throughout Northern Ireland and the RoI as non-offensive??? As non offensive say as playing outside an empty chapel perhaps???

We ask all these question because Miltown cemetery is owned and administrated by the Roman Catholic dioceses of Down and Connor???

http://www.downandconnor.org/blog/2012/03/22/22-march-2012-statement-trustees-milltown-cemetery/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtt6Or_y1sY&feature=fvwrel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N1tJWOZqkQ&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GmOUkIPQ1Q&feature=related

We would further like to ask the Roman Catholic Bishop of Derry to confirm if he approves and condones the use of Roman Catholic Church property for Irish republican bands to practice in? In particular Irish republican bands named after Irish republican sectarian murdering terrorists. The republican band in this instance is the Kevin Lynch memorial flute band, named in honour of an INLA terrorist, and prisoner who committed suicide while in prison.

Kevin Lynch’s terrorist group the INLA were responsible for the Darkly massacre. A gang of INLA sectarian murdering terrorist burst into a small isolated Protestant Mission Hall near the border. And as the congregation of God Fearing defenceless men, women and children were singing hymns. They indiscriminately shot into the congregation. Killing three of the congregation and injuring many more.

http://www.victims.org.uk/darkley.html

http://www.victims.org.uk/darkleytestimony.html

This INLA branded republican band uses St. Canice's Church Hall, Dungiven. Again we must ask is this an appropriate venue for the INLA terrorist supporting republican band to practice their sectarian, anti-Unionist, Protestant, Loyalist music and ethos. And does the Roman Catholic church consider this a non-sectarian and non-offensive use of their Roman Catholic church buildings???

http://www.freewebs.com/kevinlynchmfb/jointheband.htm

Here is a sectarian if not illegal part of the INLA Kevin Lynch bands website. It asks the visitor which Irish republican paramilitary grouping would you join??? The IRA, INLA, CIRA or the RIRA. All of these terrorist organisations have carried out many sectarian murders of Protestant, Unionist and Loyalist men, women and children.

http://polls.freewebs.com/Members/Polls/viewPollResults.jsp?pollID=1549291&userID=10735783

http://www.freewebs.com/kevinlynchmfb/yourarmychoice.htm

If the Roman Catholic Church is consistent in it’s condemnation and revulsion at all displays of sectarianism then surely the Roman Catholic authorities must act with immediate effect to remove any and all displays and stop the use of their property for sectarian purposes. These must include all Irish republican parades be they paramilitary or political that assemble at or raily at any Roman Catholic church property.

We have seen Roman Catholic Church property used on many occasions as the assembly or finishing point for republican marchers. Where men and women in paramilitary style uniforms, some with their faces covered and wearing dark glasses (in effect hiding their identity) and others who are carrying weapons.

Has the Roman Catholic Church ever considered that the Protestant, Unionist Loyalist community would not find these sectarian paramilitary terrorist displays and activities on Roman Catholic Church property as anything other than sectarian and offensive? The same offence they allegedly took at a band playing allegedly offensive tunes outside one of their closed and empty chapels.

Offence is not the exclusive preserve of Roman Catholic’s, republicans or nationalists. Do we as the Protestant Unionist and Loyalist community not deserve the same respect from the Roman Catholic authorities that they are demanding of the Protestant, Unionist and Loyalist and Loyal Order community???

In the video below members of the republican Sinn Fein, can be seen marching around Dublin in full view of the Irish police the Garda, in paramilitary uniforms with masks and dark classes, in an attempt to hide their identities. I would suggest that if this was a Loyal Order march or a Loyalist march in the republic of Ireland the Garda would be straight in and arrested those taking part. But as this is a republican march they are apparently given the republics approval by the inaction of the republics police force.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDvd2ToiICI&feature=related

Off the wall thinking!!!

I have been traveling along the Falls road these last few days and it struck me that there are several chapels St Pauls at the corner of Cavendish Street and the Falls, and further up the Falls St John’s, opposite the City Cemetery.

I then thought to myself do republican bands who pass these and other chapels and cemeteries and who use other Roman Catholic owned and consecrated properties. Are they required to play Hymns?

We have been told that Roman Catholic chapels and property have a special place in terms of respect because of the sacraments contained therein and their cemeteries are consecrated or holy ground. This special place status does not extend to Protestant churches?

Therefore if it is correct that only loyalist bands are required to play Hymns when passing such places is this not discriminatory? Shouldn't republican bands be required to play Hymns outside Roman Catholic chapels and on their property? After all republican tunes about IRA terrorist activities should be as abhorrent to the Roman Catholic church as the alleged famine song? After all it’s about RESPECT!!!

I was always told that respect was something that must be earned. Respect is a funny thing these days; we have a Roman Catholic priest, his congregation and Sinn Fein politicos demanding respect for their chapels.

Yet the same diocese that these chapels belongs to, has allowed its property to be used for many years and several times a year for all the differing types of IRA and Irish republican groups, to hold terrorist displays, commemorations and republican political rabble-rousing.

Strange thing to demand respect from one community for playing tunes outside one of your closed and empty chapels. Yet that very same churches hierarchy go out of their way to disrespect the other community by allowing their owned and administrated property to be used for terrorist displays, commemorations and political speeches.

Strange thing respect; I seem to remember a bible story, about “first taking the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye”!

And then there’s a quote by George Herbert, “Whose house is of glass must not throw stones at another”!

Strange religion the religion of Rome they are quick to take offence from others yet not so quick to recognize their offence to others, log and speck in a glass house comes to mind!!!!

Isn't that right Sean Brady and Noel Treanor!!!

Crumlin road parade

Firstly I take it the Lodge or the Institution is going to take this absurd determination to the courts to get a judicial review?

Are they along with the leaders of Unionism going to demand that the discredited parades commission change this disgraceful determination? Change the time of the sectarian anti-Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist, Orange, political demonstration and to ensure the human rights of the PLUO community and ensure the parade can return at its normal time?

This illogical and irrational determination rewards republican sectarian street politics and the threat of violence!

I have a few questions that need further investigation and answers?

After this totally illogical, irrational and impractical 4pm return parade deadline, are the psni, making contingency plans to remain at this point for the rest of the evening, and at the same strength that would be required for the safe return of the PULO who will be returning home at their normal time, and do they have the Army on standby if they can't cope with the inherent threat of republican violence from the anti-PULO political republican demonstration?

Can the discredited parades commission guarantee this absurd decision is going to reduce the likelihood of republican violence from the various warring republican groupings in Ardoyne?

The warring republican groupings who are raising community tensions by organized this anti-Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist, Orange community political demonstration should not be rewarded. As they are all to well aware of the inherent dangers of engaging in their sectarian street politics. 

The grouping involved in this sectarian street politics is same grouping who are opposed to the psni, as much as they are to any part of the PULO community and culture? Therefore by their sectarian actions they are forcing the area to be overtly policed and increasing the possibly of violence.

Can assurances be given that the lawful persons from the PULO community who are on foot, going about their lawful business of wanting to go home after the day’s joyous cultural events. They will not be attacked or inhabited by the psni due to this determination?

Will the parades commission ensure the human rights of the PULO community will no be violated by the psni, because of republican sectarian street politics by anti-peace process republicans?

  

Are the psni going to stop the PULO community in their basic human right, of returning home along the Crumlin road?

If so why?

Are the psni going to stop families, friends or individuals men, women and children from the PULO community, from the basic human right to access the Crumlin road to make their way safely home?

If so why?

Are the psni, going to detain contain, cattle then herded together and force the PULO community up the Crumlin road because they attended a lawful Orange Parade?

Will the parades commission accept the responsibility for the detaining and containing and cattling of the PULO community by the psni?

Are the psni going to forcibly disperse the PULO community and make them take unnecessary detours through other republican (Oldpark, Bone and Cliftonville) areas at further the risk of republican violence, to get to their homes in Ballysillan and Ardoyne.

If so why?

Will the parades commission accept the responsibility for the forcible dispersing of the PULO community by the psni?

If not why not?

Are the psni and parades commission going to guarantee the PULO community safe passage past the baying republican mobs that will still be roaming around the area after their anti PULO sectarian political demonstration?

If not why not?

Is the leader of Unionism Peter Robinson going to make representations on behalf of the community he says he leads?

If not why not? 

Is Peter Robinson going to be on the Crumlin road, to demand and insure the human rights of his community?

If not why not? 

Is Peter Robinson going to ensure that the psni act in an impartial and equitable manner?

If not why not?

Is Peter Robinson going to guarantee his communities safe passage home?

If not why not?

Is Peter Robinson going to leave the shambles that is the Stormont assembly due to the hideously grotesque breach of the human rights of the people he says he leads???

If not why not????

Ardoyne priest

In Northern Ireland it is a criminal offence to withhold information of a crime from the police. Now that we know that, that puts that interesting priest from Ardoyne holy cross priest Aidan Troy on a bit of a sticky wicket.

The Ardoyne priest Aidan Troy who came to our attention as the priest; who along with the parents, was at the centre of the disturbing spectacle of escorting children through the front line of a disturbing dispute between feuding adults.

The manner of his sticky wicket is that, Ardoyne holy cross priest Aidan Troy, was asked to mediate on behalf of west Belfast man Liam Adams in the alleged child sexual and physical abuse allegations brought by Liam Adams' daughter Aine Tyrell.


Coincidently as soon as this story broke, Ardoyne holy cross priest Aidan Troy announced his immediate departure to France. Ardoyne holy cross priest Aiden Troy sure works in mysterious ways.

http://saoirse.21.forumer.com/a/gerry-adams-brother-wanted-for-abuse-of-his-own-daughter_post3791.html


Irish Examiner

IT has emerged Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams believed his brother to be a serious child sex abuser for over 20 years before informing either the gardaí or Northern Irish police.
In an Ulster television Insight documentary, screened last night, Mr Adams admitted that in early 1987 he became aware of allegations that his brother Liam had repeatedly sexually abused his own daughter since she was four years old.

However despite stating that from "the very beginning" he believed his niece Áine Tyrell’s claims to have been sexually abused by her father, the Sinn Féin president failed to inform gardaí or instigate any other justice proceedings.

In the documentary, Mr Adams said he was now willing to bear "witness in support of Áine and against Liam". He also called on his brother, who is believed to have been "on the run" in the Republic since a warrant for his arrest was issued by the PSNI in November 2008, to give himself up.

Liam Adams, who is in his late 50s, faces 29 charges.

The programme alleged that as late as 2007 Áine Tyrell, who left Northern Ireland as a teenager in the 1980s to live in Scotland, had encountered attempts by prominent Belfast priest Fr Aidan Troy to "mediate" on behalf of her father rather than allow him face criminal prosecution.

Last night Fr Troy issued a statement denying claims he had attempted to persuade Ms Tyrell, aged 36, from proceeding with a case.

Ms Tyrell said she had first informed her family about the abuse in the mid-1980s. When Gerry Adams was informed of the allegations he organised a meeting between the victim, her mother and his brother Liam.

Ms Tyrell decided not to pursue the prosecution at that time but when she discovered her father had started working with children in community groups she decided to reactivate her case.


Read more: http://www.examiner.ie/ireland/adams-knew-of-sex-abuse-allegations-against-his-brother-for-over-20-years-108261.html#ixzz1UcRsAody

Protestants, Unionists, Loyalists must awaken and start a movement for Unionist Unity and Change.

Firstly we are constantly being told by the provisional republican movement in the guise of IRA/Sinn Fein, that they are at peace and the war is over. However we shouldn't forget this non murdering phase was foisted upon them by the events of September 11 2001.

The Protestant/Unionist/Loyalist people need to be mindful that the provisional republican movement’s objectives have not changed just their current means of achieving those means.
“They haven’t gone away you know” and “the Armalite and the ballot box”!

Two of the republican movement’s most ardent mantras! The provisional IRA have allegedly decommissioned however we will never know? However, there are still many other IRA terrorists out there, many of them ex-provos willing and able and taking up were the provisional republican movement left of. The political wing of the provisional republican movement, Sinn Fein, will take any advantage gained from the current crop of IRA terrorists. So the two mantras above are as relevant today, as the time they were uttered by Gerry Adams and Danny Morrison.

In this era of republican peace you would think the provisional republican movement would assist the PSNI or the Historical Enquiries Team; in the handing over of information on their former IRA colleges the alleged dissident IRA murderers and bombers. Especially those from the provisional republican movement who are in positions power and leadership at Stormont. Well they haven't be helping the PSNI or HET. This can only be seen as evidence of the provisional republican movement strategic political thinking and riding two campaigns at once.

I said alleged dissident IRA because this is a media term that is over emphasized at every report. The glaring issue is there are too many provisional IRA members in their ranks for them to be dissident. Only a short time ago these same provisional IRA members were regarded as mainstream and heroes.

The provisional republican movement have taken this strategic decision, judging that at this moment in time is a good time to go through a politically expedient non-murdering phase? As I mentioned above the provisional republican movement’s current non murdering phase and current political position has to be seen in the context of their and in particular Sinn Fein’s slump in support in the US post 9/11. They never fully bought into the GFA, not until it was politically expedient for them.

To save face the republican movement had to sell the peace as a win for them, to their submissive sycophant supporters. However the reality was very different. The republican movement did not achieve the united Ireland they murdered for. The Irish government changed their constitution the remove articles 2 and 3. And the leaders of the republican movement are now at Stormont administrating British rule (very poorly) in Ireland. Overturning 90years of their anti-British opposition to any British rule in Ireland, a very strange type of provisional republican win?

That said we should not forget as many Unionist politicians seem to have. That the provisional republican movement did not come out and fully support the Good Friday Agreement. However to listen to any spokesperson from the provisional republican movement, you would think it was they alone who dragged the Protestant/Unionist/Loyalist people screaming and kicking to vote for the peace through the GFA. How ironic and classic republican revisionism!!!

The provisional republican movement came to this new phase in their campaign with an inbuilt insecurity, as it was infiltrated at the highest levels, by British Intelligence (Dennis Donaldson and Freddie Scappaticci). This has given them a complex where they see collusion everywhere. And isn’t it ironic that Dennis Donaldson was murdered by IRA dissidents. These same IRA dissidents who Martin McGuinness’s later called Irish traitors, expedient or what?

Politically the provisional republican movement refuses or should that be can’t throw off the shackles of their past, especially that of the hunger strikers. They are therefore shackled to their ex IRA prisoners and their past. Add to this their own very special brand of victim-hood, revisionism and perceived insecurity; and they are in a political paralysis. Therefore the provisional republican movement are caught on the horns of a dilemma.

To move forward means leaving their past behind, and to do so would mean leaving their ex IRA prisoners behind. However they have a too many ex-prisoners, who are now looking for their payback. Not just in cash terms but in terms of republican community power and influence. The ex IRA prisoners are now using their influence to ensure political nepotism. The price the ex IRA prisoners are demanding is in jobs at Stormont. This is because as ex IRA prisoners they have had an exclusive and commanding roll as alleged community workers in republican areas for many years. Having to constantly look over its shoulder at these ex IRA prisoners and this constant ex-prisoner navel gazing leaves the provisional republican movement in a political paralysis.
This position of ex IRA prisoner special adviser and election candidate is seen to have a secondary benefit that of irritating Unionists. This is notwithstanding the very real hurt and distress it causes the victims of these ex IRA prisoners. As IRA victims, the provisional republican movement don’t these victims as victims and regard them as irrelevant, insignificant and invisible. Just look at the provisional republican movement indignant rage at the media’s faux fury at the appointment of convicted IRA murderer Mary McArdle(McArdle now well established as special advisor to Sinn Fein minister Carol Cullen).

The provisional republican movement’s inability or more likely their reluctance to improve the prospects for their electorate leaves them in a paradox and this is systematic of their political revisionism and political paralysis. This paradox means that a more affluent, socially mobile and middle class nationalist/republican electorate is less likely to vote for a party/movement that is Marxist.

For verification of this we just need to look at the reaction from middle class nationalists and the roman catholic churches maintained education sector’s. Just look at the furore there was from these groups at Sinn Fein’s decision to scrap the 11+. However due to the provisional republican movement dogma and desire to be seen to be punishing the Unionist middle classes, they pushed on and scraped the 11+ regardless. And to ensure that this dogma is continued they have held on to the education portfolio at Stormont.

A prosperous nationalist/republican electorate is an oxymoron, and counterproductive to the provisional republican movement. This is why the provisional republican movement puts their ex-prisoners in front line of their politics. They are their best foot soldiers at promoting the provisional republican movement’s Marxist dogma. In limiting of the life chances of the vast majority of nationalist children and their electorate, and in keeping their electorate ghettoised and insecure, who better to do this than the IRA ex-prisoner foot soldiers. Ex-IRA prisoners who know how to take orders and repress republican communities.

We the Protestant/Unionists /Loyalist people are constantly being told by the republican movement, to move on and put our past behind us. But how are we collectively the Protestant/Unionists /Loyalist people along with wider society supposed to move on. When the provisional republican movement holds onto their past like a comfort blanket and trail it out with childish regularity.

The core of this issue is the only people the provisional republican movement are deluding is that of their electorate. They have never deluded Protestant/Unionists /Loyalist people. All this talk from the provisional republican movement, on moving on is only empty rhetoric. The only thing that the provisional republican movement is doing is antagonizing the Protestant/Unionist/Loyalist people. However that seems to be playing well to the republican gallery.

With little in the way of economic or social gains the provisional republican movement’s, drone like electorate will still be there making their X’s and 123’s. To think republicans used to claim that Unionist voters were blinded by their narrow view of events. It seems that the provisional republican movement’s electorate will vote Sinn Fein no matter how little prosperity and social mobility they achieve for their children or themselves, strange type of logic. At least they can’t lay that at the door of Unionists.
So there you have it, no matter how little Sinn Fein delivers for their electorate, no matter how much hypocrisy and Sinn Fein/IRA nepotism they indulge in. The provisional republican movement’s electoral cannon fodder will continue to vote for them, sheep like. Can it be that it is more important that provisional republican movement’s electorate perceive Sinn Fein as teaching the nasty Unionists and British a lesson. And this perceived teaching a lesson to Unionists and the British is far more important than making their electorate more prosperous.

The provisional republican movement’s electorate needs to wake up and start smelling the coffee. The provisional republican movement are carrying on their squalid petty sectarian campaign form Stormont, in councils and on the ground and the more effort they put into this the less time they have for the real needs of their electorate.
To all those who voted Sinn Fein, you need to ask yourself two simple questions? 1 Do I want Sinn Fein carry on their petty sectarian campaign?
or
2 Do I want Sinn Fein to provide the education that our children need in the 21stcentury, to bringing the jobs we all need and want and provide the health and social care we all need?
If you answered 1 you are getting great value for your vote. If however you want 2. The more time Sinn Fein spends on the first question, the less time they can spend on doing what is really needed in the second question.
So it comes down to this, vote Sinn Fein and keep IRA/Sinn Fein paramilitary nepotism, limited social mobility and limited life opportunities!
Sinn Fein is living up to their Most Oppressed People Ever (M.O.P.E) title with renewed vigour.
Please check out the following link to get an insight into some clear thinking in republican west Belfast.
http://sluggerotoole.com/2008/03/20/gerry-must-go…
Watch the clips in the links below to listen to the republican movement’s never ending revisionism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgL9VxxwMdA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TXu8fIxRFQ